The Future of Small Asbestos Consultancies: What Happens If UKAS Accreditation Becomes Mandatory?

In recent discussions surrounding asbestos management in the UK, one topic is causing particular concern among small, independent asbestos consultancies: the possibility that the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) may mandate UKAS accreditation for all asbestos-related services.

While the aim of ensuring consistent quality and safety across the industry is commendable, the reality for many small businesses is stark. UKAS accreditation, while thorough, comes with significant financial and administrative burdens. For smaller firms, many of whom provide excellent, compliant services, these costs are simply unsustainable.

UKAS fees can run into the tens of thousands, not including the time and resources needed to maintain compliance and prepare for regular audits. For large national firms, this is a manageable part of doing business. But for small consultancies—often one- or two-person operations—these costs could easily spell the end of trading.

The potential fallout is serious. If UKAS accreditation becomes mandatory, we risk losing a large portion of the sector’s most agile, community-focused, and experienced professionals. This not only affects livelihoods but may also limit asbestos services in rural or underserved regions, increasing health risks where awareness and control are already limited.

There must be a balanced approach. If accreditation is to be mandated, the HSE should also consider:

*Tiered fees or subsidies for micro-businesses

*An alternative accreditation route for small consultancies

*A phased implementation period to allow preparation time

Without these kinds of considerations, the future of small asbestos consultants in the UK looks increasingly uncertain. We have until the 18th April 2025 to voice your concerns.